← Guides

Guides · Glossary

Glossary

Payment and crypto filing vocabulary — short definitions for the nouns that decide price, banking, and whether a permission can move.

Payments · crypto · transfer · Aug 2026

Core filing vocabulary

Authorisation core
A regulator’s grant to carry on regulated activities — often prudential and conduct conditions attached. Stronger than a bare administrative registration. UK/EU payments usually say “authorised PI/EMI.”
Licence / license core
Marketing word for “permission to operate.” On the file it may mean authorisation, a state MTL, a VARA activity licence — or only a registration. Always match the live register string, not the slide.
Registration core
Being listed for an administrative or AML gate (e.g. UK MLR crypto register, US FinCEN MSB). Necessary in many seats; not by itself a product/prudential licence. Guide →
Permission string core
What the public register actually records: activity type, limitations, agent vs principal, expiry. The string is the underwriting fact; “licensed fintech” is not.
Perimeter core
Which activities fall inside a regulatory regime. Same commercial product can sit inside payment rules, crypto rules, both, or neither — by jurisdiction.
NCA core
National competent authority — the member-state (or national) supervisor that authorises and supervises under EU instruments such as MiCA or PSD2.
Filing-ready core
A structure, pack, or application that can be submitted or transferred without rebuilding the file from marketing claims — evidence, named people, and CoC path included.
Shelf entity core
A registered or authorised company sold as already “set up.” Value depends on what sits on the register and whether change of control is approvable — not on how clean the pitch deck looks.

Payment line

Payment institution (PI) payment
Firm authorised to provide payment services under UK PSRs / EU PSD2 (execution, remittance, acquiring, etc.). Scope is schedule-limited — check which services are on the authorisation. UK sources → · EU sources →
E-money institution (EMI) payment
Authorised to issue electronic money. Different capital and safeguarding profile from a PI. “Payment licence” on a slide often blurs PI vs EMI.
Small PI payment
UK (and similar) lower-volume exemption path. Not full PI authorisation — sellers sometimes still call it a “payment licence.”
Agent (of a PI) payment
Provides services under another institution’s authorisation. On a share sale, the agent relationship may not travel with the company the way a principal authorisation can.
Safeguarding payment
Rules requiring segregation or protection of customer funds (PI/EMI relevant funds; SG MPI trust arrangements, etc.). DD looks for bank letters, reconciliations, and method — not just a policy PDF.
E-money float payment
Outstanding e-money liabilities. Must sit against capital and safeguarding — mismatch is a wind-down / redemption risk in buy-side review.
MSB payment
US money services business. FinCEN registration is federal AML paperwork — not a state licence to transmit money. US sources →
MTL / money transmitter licence payment
US state licence to engage in money transmission. Often the real gating item beside FinCEN. CoC and passport myths die on the state grid.
MPI / SPI / MC payment
Singapore Payment Services Act licence classes (e.g. major / standard payment institution, money-changing). Thresholds and activity lists decide the class — SPI at MPI volumes is a red flag. SG sources →
Open banking (AIS / PIS) payment
Account information (AIS) and payment initiation (PIS) services under PSD2 / UK open banking. Narrow permissions; partner contracts often terminate on change of control.
PSP payment
Payment service provider — loose commercial label. Map it to the local legal category (PI, EMI, MPI, CBUAE category, etc.) before underwriting.
PSD2 payment
EU Payment Services Directive — backbone for PI authorisation and open banking in the EEA. Evolving toward PSD3 / PSR; check national implementation for the file in front of you.

Crypto line

VASP crypto
Virtual asset service provider — FATF-era term still used in many national AML / licensing regimes (and pre-MiCA EU registers). Not identical to MiCA “CASP.”
CASP crypto
Crypto-asset service provider under MiCA — EU authorisation for listed crypto services. Passporting via notifications; not automatic from a legacy VASP stamp. MiCA guide →
MiCA crypto
Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 — EU framework for crypto-asset white papers, ART/EMT, and CASP authorisation.
ART / EMT crypto
Asset-referenced token / e-money token under MiCA. Issuers face authorisation, reserve, and disclosure rules separate from (but related to) CASP service authorisation.
Crypto-asset white paper crypto
MiCA-mandated disclosure document for many offers / admissions to trading — content rules plus, from Dec 2025, iXBRL filing format. Not a startup pitch PDF.
DPT crypto
Digital payment token under Singapore’s Payment Services Act. DPT service can sit inside the same PS Act licensing family as other payment services — check class and scope on MAS FID.
MLR crypto registration (UK) crypto
UK AML/CTF registration for in-scope cryptoasset business. Gateway, not FSMA product authorisation. Dual track: FSMA crypto regime incoming. UK sources →
BitLicense crypto
New York DFS virtual currency licence. Separate from FinCEN MSB registration and from other states’ MTLs.
VARA crypto
Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority — onshore VA licensing. Not the same as CBUAE payments or ADGM/DIFC free-zone regimes. UAE sources →
Travel Rule crypto
Obligation to transmit originator/beneficiary information with virtual-asset transfers (FATF-aligned). Shows up in AML programmes and banking friction — not a substitute for licensing status.
Grandfathering crypto
Transitional permission for existing VASPs while they seek MiCA CASP authorisation. Deadlines are member-state specific; “we’re grandfathered” expires.

Transfer & control

Change of control (CoC) transfer
Regulator approval or non-opposition when ownership/controllers cross thresholds. Often a condition precedent to closing — not a post-completion notice you can “fix later.”
Qualifying holding transfer
Ownership/control stake that triggers prior assessment (common EU pattern: 20/30/50% bands under MiCA Art. 83 and similar payment rules). Closing without clearance is the buyer’s problem.
Passporting transfer
Using a home authorisation to serve other EEA states via notification. UK post-Brexit payment firms do not keep an EU passport. MiCA CASP passport is notification-based — verify host filings.
FSMA Part XII transfer
UK change-in-control regime for many authorised firms (thresholds commonly 10/20/30/50%). Separate track from MLR crypto CoC if both apply.
Fit and proper / key persons transfer
Controllers, directors, and named function holders who must be approved or notified. Buying the entity without a post-close people plan can stall the permission even when CoC clears.
Reverse solicitation transfer
Claim that clients approached the firm so cross-border licensing does not apply. Narrow, fact-specific, and often oversold in decks — treat as a red flag until counsel maps the actual solicitation trail.

Not legal advice. Definitions are working language for educated buyers and applicants. For instruments and registers, open the jurisdiction library. For a diligence pack, see SKU-01.